Hi friends,
It has been a while since the last post! I am sorry. I have spent a lot of time planning, and grading, and trying to get into a new rhythm. Let me catch you up on a few things:
I am finally at the point where I actually feel tired – for the first few weeks, I was running on such high energy that I didn’t notice how late I was staying up, or how much class took out of me. Last week I hit the exhaustion wall. And today, in rainy Grand Rapids, I felt even more exhausted. It’s the weather. It’s the fifth week of school. I’m feeling it.
And my students are feeling it, too – I have a class that meets at 7:45 in the morning, and while they studiously do everything I tell them to do, I know that they live behind a film of sleep-filled apathy. I know it. I can see it in their eyes. My other two classes are talkative and engaged, and they have their own challenges, but it’s the early ones that I feel sorry for. They get the first draft of my lesson plans, which means that they get the brunt of when the plans don’t work; they get my own weary, blurry-sounding instructions, my rushes to class because the bus was slow, my lame morning jokes. Also, none of them watch the Office. I tried to reference Jim and Pam the other day, and they just stared at me. And all my culturally-relevant jokes go out the window….
The hardest thing, and the thing that makes me feel the most unsure of myself, is the actual work of lesson planning – I often feel like I am floating above my plans, unable to really say what I’m looking for, or what I’m trying to do – it also doesn’t help that I’m making up a curriculum for this class as I go, simply because it’s impossible to have a set schedule of things/expectations when I don’t know what those are, even though I spent hours making a syllabus. Even though I have a clear idea of the major assignments and goals of the course, it’s hard to know how to get there; what steps do I take to give my students the ability to write a real thesis? One that reflects real thought, and attention, and understanding?
So I flounder a bit. And I flounder because I want the steps to be intentional, because I want my students to know exactly what they are thinking and how they got there, because I am more about process than lecture. Don’t get me wrong. I’ve lectured a lot in the past few weeks, almost every day, and it has been challenging and rewarding. Working an overhead projector is not my strong point. But lecturing has been helpful in terms of making me more specific – it’s easy to just tell someone that their writing is sloppy, but it’s more important to show them why; to give them a common language in class and in their understanding of the writing process; to name what it is they do so that they have ownership of their writing, responsibility for it and to it. I’d rather sound confused and correct myself than give them a bunch of terms that don’t work and that don’t have value in their disciplines, in their lives.
We’ve spent the past few weeks reading through the Writer’s Almanac, which has been the biggest joy. I’ve had so many students, especially my male, football-playing, number-crunching-accountant students, tell me that they’ve finally gotten a poem because of one that they’ve read in the Writer’s Almanac; I’ve had students with reading disabilities catch the lines of a Martin Espada poem (“White Birches,” a lovely tear-jerker of a poem) in a way that my more advanced students could not, in a way that caught the essence of the poem’s images with complexity and depth; I’ve had students write essays about fishing and factories and escapes from Bosnian warcamps that have knocked me on my ass. I guess that means I’m doing something right if I can be surprised by the students’ work.
And I hope it means something that I’ve surprised them, too, that I’ve caught their attention in a way that is more than fleeting. I flounder. I am not there yet. But I am surprised at the angles I am taking – that, in my focus on the practicalities of writing for their majors, that I have told them things like “Literature is beautiful; literature is about the search for beauty amidst the tragic; literature helps us further define the tragic and the beautiful in our own ordinary lives.” I’m surprised by that because, while I believe those things with all my heart, I did not set out to say them. I did not mean to be that kind of English teacher, the one who wears purple sweaters and makes bad jokes and reads James Wright to her students in the hopes that their ears would hang on the beautiful parts, that they would be open to beauty, that I would be the one to open it to them. I’ve done all those things. It is a surprise to me still.
The narrator of Gilead, who, at the end of the novel, speaks these words to his son: “I’ll pray that you grow up a brave man in a brave country. I will pray that you find a way to be useful.”
I’m sure that I will flounder some more – tomorrow, the Dean of Arts and Sciences is coming in to observe my class, to see what I’m doing right and what I need to work on. She is a nice woman, and I’m sure that it will be fine. I hope the floundering is minimal, that I’ll be brave and that the useful way is found.